-
FDUSD is a stablecoin issued by First Digital Labs, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, and part of the Hong Kong-based First Digital Group.
-
First Digital Labs is not a regulated issuer of stablecoins or digital assets.
-
FDUSD is backed by USD cash deposits and US T-Bills with a maturity of less than 3 months. These assets are held by banks and custodians in Hong Kong, Switzerland, and Australia.
-
Although the reserves are held in custody by a Hong-Kong trust, we believe these reserves are not bankruptcy-remote. In the event of bankruptcy of the issuer or its holding company, users’ funds may not be isolated from the liquidation process.
-
FDUSD meets the bare minimum requirements to achieve a passing grade.
-
At present, FDUSD lacks meaningful utility and is appropriate for those who wish to benefit from Binance's Zero Trading Fee promotion on the BTC/FDUSD pair. For all other users, safer and/or more liquid alternatives exist.
The Stability factor is evaluated on the following:
- Reserves Management - Quality, quantity, storage and segregation of reserve assets
- Market Feedback - Indicators of market's confidence in a stablecoin derived from price and trade data
- Mechanism - Stabilization methods that protect the stablecoin
The Management factor is evaluated on the following:
- Restrictions - What deterrents exist to prevent key personnel of stablecoin projects from unethical and illegal behavior?
- Negative Track Record - Have key personnel been involved in scams, frauds or other illegal activities?
This factor evaluates technical implementation using sub-factors that cover smart contract quality, oracle & bridge risk, supply integrity, and more.
This rating was published under a previous version of our methodology, which did not assign a standalone score to this factor.
The Decentralization factor is evaluated on the following:
- Platform Censorship Risk
- Custodian Risk
- Type of Collateral
- Diversified Voting Power
- User Censorship Risk
The Governance factor for fiat-backed stablecoins is evaluated on the following:
1. Holder Protection - What rules, statutes or code exist to protect interests of stablecoin holders?
2. Reserves Verification - What checks are done to ensure existence of reserves?
3. Redemptions - Do issuers have transparent and reasonable redemption terms?
This factor evaluates external feedback using indicators like prediction markets, social sentiment, perpetual futures, and more.
Currently, we do not assign a standalone score to this factor. An independent assessment of external feedback will be included in future iterations.